This is Handel on the Law, marginal legal advice where I tell you you have absolutely no case.

All right, this is out of Israel, and Israel is being blamed for so many civilian deaths in Gaza.

And the argument is, and very few people are saying that Israel is not justified in attacking Hamas because of that massacre October 7th.

Where the criticism kicks in is they have not stopped.

And here you are basically over a year later,

and Gaza has been decimated. 80% of the buildings have just been destroyed, and virtually the entire population has been displaced and starvation and the only way they can live the Palestinians living in Gaza is international aid coming in

and Israel is being accused of stopping that aid not letting it through which there is validity to. And some 44,000 Palestinians have died.

Now, the world doesn't talk about how many of them are militants.

It's just men, women, and children, et cetera.

About a third are fighters.

So that I don't care about.

But about two-thirds are innocent civilians.

And the problem is that innocent civilians are in Gaza,

and it's very difficult for Israel to target Hamas when they're embedded in the civilian population.

Okay, that's the background.

So Amnesty International, sort of a bipartisan, I don't know about that.

Organization just came out with the report, almost 300 pages, that says evidence gathered over nine months.

They have been able to prove, or they have the evidence that Israeli forces and government authorities have committed genocide under the United Nations

Genocide Convention. Straight out. They are guilty. Israel is guilty of genocide, which is a,

that is a loaded term. But Israel, I don't have a problem with Israel. And I'm as pro-Israeli as they come. I don't have a problem with Israel. I'm as pro-Israeli as they come.

I don't have a problem with Israel defending itself,

but going after and not letting humanitarian aid in,

...