meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
The Realignment

539 | Didi Kuo & Steve Teles: Why Are Political Parties So Unpopular?

The Realignment

The Realignment

Technology, News Commentary, National Security, Marshall Kosloff, International Relations, News, Public Policy, Economics, Politics, Saager Enjeti, U.s. Politics, Policy

4.82.5K Ratings

🗓️ 28 February 2025

⏱️ 67 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Didi Kuo, author of The Great Retreat: How Political Parties Should Behave and Why They Don't, joins the Niskanen Center's Steve Teles and Marshall on The Realignment. Didi, Steve, and Marshall discuss why political parties have reached record levels of unpopularity in the United States, what "good" political parties could look like, the history of party reform organizations like the Democratic Leadership Council of the 1980s and 1990s, the positive case for political parties as a way of organizing the will of the people, and the differences between the American party system and alternatives across the democratic world.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

here, welcome back to the realignment. Hey, everyone, welcome up to the show. I'm joined on today's

0:06.3

episode by my sometimes realignment partner, the Nis-Cannan Center and John Hopkins

0:11.5

universities, Steve Talley's, were interviewing Stanford's Dudi Quo about her new book, The Great

0:17.7

Retreat, How Political Parties Should Behave, and Why They Don't, when it comes to how

0:22.7

unpopular they are. Political parties as institutions are at the bottom of the stack ranking of everything

0:29.6

in our society, whether it's Congress, the military, police, government itself, etc. Imagine almost

0:37.3

anything you interact with in your daily life

0:39.7

and people will find that thing to be more popular and trusted than political parties. So given this

0:45.6

fact, though, the fact that our two parties have remained stable and that a lot of the efforts

0:50.0

to both launch third parties but also expand democracy in ways that would hypothetically

0:55.1

create more opportunities for new parties. Everything from ranked choice voting to putting

1:00.1

aside traditional first-past-the-vote procedure hasn't been particularly successful, nor

1:05.2

has it captured the popular imagination. So the big question, as we move into 2025 2025 is what does all of this mean for the

1:12.6

two parties themselves and how can we reflect upon this broader story of how political parties

1:16.9

have operated across the industrialized West over the past two centuries. How can this all inform

1:22.3

how we think about the future? Hope you all enjoy the conversation. D.D. Quo, welcome to the realignment.

1:30.0

Thank you so much, Marshall. It's great to be here. And hi, Steve. Hi, Dee. So Steve is here as well.

1:36.1

This is the first time we've done a joint interview, Steve. Though I will note, there's been a bunch of

1:41.3

our professor academic network who've asked to come on the Steve and Marshall show.

1:46.9

So, Dee Dee, you're joining us for a pilot edition of this format where the broader Steve

1:52.4

cinematic universe joins this format.

1:55.4

So we're excited to have you.

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in -32 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Realignment, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Realignment and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.