Recently, Catholic commenter Michael Knowles took an audience question at a live event about how to foster a greater love for the Eucharist,

which prompted an impromptu discussion on Catholicism with evangelical commenter Charlie Kirk.

In today's episode, I want to expand a bit more on their discussion and show how Kirk's critique of Catholicism actually undermines the Protestantism he defends.

However, bear with me, my voice is

still out after getting over a cold and speaking at Sikh 2025. I also want to be clear that I'm not

interested in critiquing Knowles' answers. This was an impromptu discussion among friends,

and Knowles is primarily a political commenter, not a Catholic apologist.

Also, I've been in the hot seat, and I can tell you it's not as easy as it looks.

You often wish you would said certain things differently or taken a different approach.

And so while I wouldn't have offered some of Knowles' comments, he did present useful roads for the discussion to go down.

So let's take a look at it.

Your goal should be to bring people to Jesus, not Catholicism.

Hold on.

What's the difference?

What's the, I don't think.

Hold on.

Hold on.

I'm not saying that they're contradictory, but your goal should not to bring people to a specific sect of Christianity.

It is to bring people to the cross.

You're saying to bring people to the fullness of the truth and the universal faith.

Yes, but not the maxims of every Catholic dogma.

I hear a lot of evangelicals say a person should follow Jesus, not a certain denomination,

...