4.6 • 949 Ratings
🗓️ 16 April 2025
⏱️ 11 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | A brief programming note for listeners of the Cato Daily podcast, after almost 18 years and more than 4,000 episodes, my time as host and executive producer of the podcast will come to an end on April 22nd. |
0:13.2 | In that final episode, I'll detail briefly what's in store for the short run of this program, what I'll be doing next, and say goodbye for now. |
0:26.7 | This is the Cater Daily podcast for Wednesday, April 16, 2025. I'm Caleb Brown. The Trump |
0:32.6 | tariffs, the product of massive delegations of authority from Congress, have constitutional problems as well. |
0:39.4 | The Liberty Justice Center is challenging the tariffs. |
0:42.0 | Cato's Ilya Soman is co-council on the case. |
0:44.9 | We spoke just before the lawsuit was filed. |
0:49.5 | Careful listeners of this podcast and people who follow the work of the Cato Institute are well aware that Congress has for decades delegated authority over trade and other areas and a number of emergency powers to the president. I think our scholars, yourself included, would say that those delegations are at least |
1:14.6 | dubious, but given the way that the president has made use of the tariff powers under claiming |
1:22.9 | emergency power to engage in this kind of laying of tariffs on countries all around the world. |
1:30.2 | What constitutional questions does that raise? |
1:33.9 | It raises a number of them. |
1:36.1 | One is, which is not purely constitutional, is just is the particular statute that he is |
1:42.4 | relying on here, the AIPA statute of 1977, whether it even |
1:49.1 | allows tariffs at all. I would contend that it does not because the word tariff is not mentioned |
1:55.4 | in the statute and no previous president has used it to impose tariffs. If it does authorize tariffs, |
2:03.3 | the statute also has two additional requirements. One is declaring a national emergency, |
2:09.0 | and the other is there has to be an unusual and extraordinary threat to the American economy |
2:14.7 | or security or the like. And we would know, we would contend there's no |
2:18.4 | unusual or extraordinary threat. There's no basis for an emergency either because the whole |
2:23.2 | justification is that we have bilateral trade deficits with lots of countries, which are neither |
2:28.4 | unusual nor extraordinary, nor they constitute a threat of any kind, because they're not actually |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in 26 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Caleb Brown, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Caleb Brown and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.