Hello, this is William Lane Craig. Here at Reasonable Faith, we are in the midst of our

fall matching grant campaign. From now until the end of the year, every gift you give to

reasonable faith will be doubled by a group of generous donors, up to $250,000.

So this is a tremendous way to double the impact of your giving to the Lord's work.

Remember, this offer goes until December 31st at midnight,

so I hope that you'll consider this and be a part of our fall

matching grant campaign. Bill recently Dr. Khalil Andani, a Harvard-trained philosopher

of religion and a Muslim, presented four points against your view of the Trinity

that we'll examine today. He did this on YouTube.

And, you know, it appears that he tried to represent you accurately. And you went through your

material. And that, of course, is always appreciated. But then it's another matter to properly

understand your views.

Quite right, Kevin. I do think Dr. Andani has done a respectable job of trying to understand the view that he's criticizing and not just engaging in Muslim polemics. However, I do think

that in his four points, all of which are very interesting,

there are some really serious misunderstandings. And so I hope that the video today will help

to clear those up. Bill, I'm Donnie claims that your view of the Trinity is, as he says,

out of the mainstream of Christian theology.

Is he right about that? And does it even matter? I think my view is out of the mainstream.

I defend what I call the biblical doctrine of the Trinity. I am convinced that within the pages

of the New Testament, we find a primitive doctrine of the Trinity, which consists of two theses.

Number one, that there is exactly one God, and number two, that there are exactly three persons,

Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, who are properly called God.

...