meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Congressional Dish

CD252: Women’s Health Protection Act

Congressional Dish

Jennifer Briney

News, Congress, Government, Politics, Corporations

4.81.1K Ratings

🗓️ 22 May 2022

⏱️ 79 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Women’s Health Protection Act is a bill written by Democrats that would guarantee access to abortion services in the United States. While this bill is unlikely to become law, learning what exactly the Democrats are proposing is instructive, as many of us will be voting with abortion in mind later this year. Now that the Supreme Court is poised to overturn previous decisions that guaranteed access to abortion services for the past 50 years, what do Democrats hope to do in response? Executive Producer: Brandon Lewis Please Support Congressional Dish – Quick Links Contribute monthly or a lump sum via Support Congressional Dish via (donations per episode) Send Zelle payments to: [email protected] Send Venmo payments to: @Jennifer-Briney Send Cash App payments to: $CongressionalDish or [email protected] Use your bank’s online bill pay function to mail contributions to: Please make checks payable to Congressional Dish Thank you for supporting truly independent media! Links to We’re Not Wrong Executive Producer Recommended Episode : A Coup for Capitalism Follow up reading: Tom Phillips, Patrick Wintour and Julian Borger. May 19, 2022. The Guardian. Background Sources Recommended Congressional Dish Episode : The Abortion Bill Abortion Background Laura Temme. May 12, 2022. FindLaw. Grace Panetta, Shayanne Gal, and Taylor Tyson. Updated May 9, 2022. Business Insider. Jon O. Shimabukuro. Feb 25, 2022. Congressional Research Service. Katherine Kortsmit et. al. Nov 27, 2020. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. United Kingdom National Health Service. Start for Life. A. Pawlowski. Nov 9, 2017. Today. Supreme Court of the United States. Jun 29, 1992. Justia. The Draft Decision Adeel Hassan. May 6, 2022. The New York Times. Supreme Court of the United States. Feb 10, 2022. Bills Sponsor: Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA) Sponsor: Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) Bill Outline Gives health care providers the right to provide abortion services and gives patients the right to receive abortion services "without any of the following limitations or requirements": Requirements to perform specific tests or medical procedures prior to an abortion Requirements that direct health providers to provide medically inaccurate information before or during abortion services Limitations on the health care provider's ability to provide drugs to the patient Limitations preventing the health care provider from performing abortion services via telemedicine Limitations placed on abortion providing facilities that are not placed on hospitals and other facilities where similar procedures are performed Requirements that the patient attend medically unnecessary pre-abortion in-person office visits Limitations on abortions "at any point or points in time prior to fetal viability" Limitations on abortions "after fetal viability when, in the good-faith medical judgement of the treating health care provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to the pregnant patient's life or health." Requirements that patients disclose the reason they want an abortion prior to fetal viability. Allows the courts to consider the following in determining if a requirement illegally impedes access to abortion services: If the requirement interferes with a health care providers ability to provide care and services or poses a risk to the patient's health or safety If the requirement would likely delay or deter some patients from accessing abortion services If the requirement is likely to increase the financial costs of providing or obtaining abortion services If the requirement would likely limit the availability of abortion services in a State or geographic region If the requirement imposes penalties on health care providers that are not imposed on or are more severe than penalties imposed on other health care providers for comparable conduct or failures to act This law would apply to the Federal Government and "each State government" and no State government can implement and enforce any law or regulation that conflicts with this law. The law would not govern physical access to clinic entrances, insurance coverage for abortions, contracts, or bans on partial birth abortions. Immediately upon enactment. Allows the Attorney General to sue any State or government official who implements or enforcement limitations or requirements that would be prohibited by this law. Allows individuals, "entities", and health care providers adversely affected by violations of the law to also sue the State that violates the law with illegal limitations and requirements The costs of the trial and attorney's fees would be paid by the State if the State loses the case. The person suing could not be forced to pay for attorney's fees if the claim was judged to be "non-frivolous" even if they lose. Sponsor: Trent Franks (R-AZ) Status: Died in 113th Congress Audio Sources May 10, 2022 September 24, 2021 Cover Art Design by Only Child Imaginations Music Presented in This Episode Intro & Exit: by (found on by mevio)

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

But unfortunately, a constitutional right to access abortion services is not actually a thing.

0:06.5

The so-called rights that we have had to access abortion services in this country

0:11.5

were granted via court rulings, not the Constitution or any national level laws.

0:17.8

And the consistent repetition of that inaccurate phrase is one of the reasons why I think so many

0:22.9

people, especially young people, are so surprised by the possible loss of access to abortion services

0:28.9

in some states in this country. We've been misled for our entire lives to think that we've had

0:35.1

a constitutionally protected right, but that's never been true. And the refusal of the previous

0:41.0

generations to make sure that it was a right protected law is how we ended up here. Congress

0:47.4

makes the laws, not the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is responsible for interpreting current law

0:54.0

in our most difficult cases. Had any national law, and especially the Constitution,

1:00.7

had said that women have the right to access abortion services and doctors have the right to

1:05.7

perform them, then we wouldn't be having this national conversation right now.

1:10.3

Instead, the states have been making the laws that govern abortion and any rights that we thought

1:15.0

we had since the early 1970s have come from, again, Supreme Court decisions about those state laws.

1:24.0

I am so damn tired of being lied to.

1:32.0

I don't think I can deny it anymore. You can stick to your story if you think it flies.

1:47.3

But I'm not going to buy it anymore.

1:54.4

Hello, darling, and thank you for listening to the 250-second episode of Congressional Dish.

2:00.4

I'm yours Jennifer Briny. If this is your first time listening to my podcast, first of all,

2:05.0

thanks for checking it out. Happy to have you here. But basically, this is not a typical political show.

2:11.6

I am obsessed with governing because I feel like I am a taxpayer who wants to know what Congress is

2:18.6

doing after the elections. I want to know what they're doing with my money and in my name, and I,

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in -1002 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jennifer Briney, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Jennifer Briney and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.