4.8 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 4 March 2024
⏱️ 24 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Book your ticket to happiness with Sun Express Airlines. I think the most important thing to take away from this decision is the one thing it didn't want didn't address, |
0:28.0 | the one thing they were most terrified of, going anywhere near the factual findings in the district court in Denver |
0:36.7 | that Donald Trump was in fact an insurrectionist and as far as I'm concerned, Donald Trump, just as he's an adjudicated |
0:46.6 | rapist, remains an adjudicated insurrectionist, even if the Supreme Court has wrongly held that the states do not have the |
0:56.0 | power to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment as against potential candidates for federal |
1:02.3 | office. |
1:03.0 | Hello everyone and welcome to George Conway explains it all to Sarah Longwell. |
1:10.0 | I am Sarah Longwell publisher of the Bullwork and I am here with George Conway for an emergency episode |
1:15.8 | Because today we got a decision from the US Supreme Court in Trump versus Anderson |
1:20.9 | overturning the Colorado Supreme Court opinion that had |
1:24.0 | disqualified Trump from the ballot for insurrection under section 3 of the |
1:28.6 | 14th Amendment. But before we get to the substance I I need to ask, what is a per curiam opinion, which is what this is? |
1:36.5 | What does that mean? |
1:37.5 | Per curiam is Latin for by the court. |
1:40.6 | And what this is is just appellate courts occasionally write per curiam opinions where no individual judge or justice signs the opinion. and that's all it means is that it's an |
1:55.3 | opinion that's not signed by any individual of the court but it is the opinion of |
2:00.0 | the court and meaning all of them no it well all of them who all of those who join |
2:05.8 | the opinion but it is it is an opinion of the court and it was joined in its |
2:10.6 | entirety by well not quite in its entirety by, well not quite in its entirety, |
2:14.1 | but by, joined in its entirety about five judges, |
2:18.1 | by justice, five justices, |
2:20.3 | and joined in substantial part by Justice Barrett and then joined only as to the result or the judgment of the bottom line by justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson. |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in -391 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Bulwark, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Bulwark and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.