My point of caution would be, one, the slavery question. I'm not sure that the sort of contemporary

left has anything like the focus or the capacity to link. The way that the Republicans, in fact,

went from 5%. Because sure, our left-wing party today could maybe a really successful one,

in some context, could win 5%. But that doesn't get us very far. The way that they went from

5% to winning

in pluralities in the North was by connecting this moral issue, which wasn't, which, yes, I think

summoning the sort of sleeping masses around the moral issue, but also connecting that moral

issue to the self-interest and the sort of felt needs of these workers, of these voters. So to find that issue today,

it's not just general resistance to the status quo on 70 years. It's not health care? Yeah.

Well, I mean. People are trying to fill the commissary of this Luigi Mangione fellow.

Prisoners are shouting from the windows of their prison, hey, improve Luigi Mangione's

conditions.

Here's Morgan is melting down on the idea of this being a left issue.

I was just on there yesterday.

And then he played a clip of Joe Rogan talking about it.

And he had the exact same take I did.

And they were all like, for Clems didn't know what to do with themselves. That's the other thing, Bree, is that when the Republican Party did come into existence,

about a quarter or more in some states of its supporters were not just these progressive wigs

who'd finally sort of gotten with it or finally had a chance to vote for the anti-slavery party

they had been wanting to vote for for a long time,

which I think was true in some places that were Western Massachusetts or in upstate New York or in the

Western Reserve, Ohio, where people were really red-hot against slavery. But there were also a lot of

...