There has been a ruling here. I would consider this still a developing story, and I'll explain why.

Tonight, the Supreme Court has intervened in the case of a Maryland father, who the Trump

administration admits. It accidentally, oops, sent him to a foreign prison in El Salvador,

even though they had no right to do it. In court, the Trump administration has admitted he was not

supposed to be sent to that foreign prison. Well, they have also maintained in court that, oh, well,

that's too bad. He's now effectively stuck in that prison maybe forever because the U.S. has no

power to get him back, even though they sent him there mistakenly.

Now, a federal judge in Maryland ordered several days ago that that could not stand for obvious

reasons, that Trump had to go and get him. The Trump administration had to go and get him

and bring him back. The judge, you might remember, gave the Trump administration a deadline

of Monday night this week,

this past week, this past Monday night at midnight was when they had to have that guy back

in the United States. After that judge's order, the Trump administration succeeded in getting

the Supreme Court to hit pause on that order until they themselves could weigh in.

Well, in this ruling tonight, the Supreme Court has weighed in.

And they have ordered that this man from Maryland, Kilmar-Abrego-Garcia, they have ordered that he has to be returned to the United States, maybe?

I say maybe, and I say this is still a developing story. So what's going to be the response?

If we've still got the antibodies to defend ourselves as a democracy, if our civil society is

still working, if our legal profession is still on the job, what we ought to see here in response

to this, in response to what will be

not just these two guys being targeted, it'll be a dozen, it'll be a hundred, it'll be a thousand

of these if Trump likes how this one goes and he isn't stopped from doing it. What we ought to see

...