I know you've been doing this for a few years now, but more public facing with high exposure factor for maybe a year and a half or so.

How long do you give a therapy with no factors change in any other subcategory of what you're doing with yourself lifestyle-wise to actually give it a shot.

So there's no contraindications.

There's no cross-contamination of results, et cetera.

We usually try to replicate papers.

Okay.

Yeah.

I guess, like the, as a baseline, to understand what we did at Blueprint, it's really

pretty simple we looked

through every single health span and lifespan study ever done we ranked them according to effect

and then we graded the evidence and we said can we take all the power laws of all the scientific

evidence ever done and implement them in me

as an experiment to say where are we at with the science of anti-aging and then we did that we put

that into a family of blueprint products for others to consume and it's i think it's an interesting

question if you just say in the year 2024 where are we at and so

we yeah we played the power law game and so if something something's down on like the 100 or 200 level

spot and there's thousands of those things we typically don't even pay much attention to it.

And so because it's just too much effort, the evidence doesn't cross a certain threshold.

So with that being said, though, how do you justify implementing things that are experimental research chemicals?

Because sometimes you will implement something like epitalon for potential

telomere lengthening properties, but it's like didn't even pass FDA approval.

Not that that's the end-all be-all, of course, but sometimes there'll be things being implemented

...