meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Axios Re:Cap

Hydroxychloroquine Questions

Axios Re:Cap

Axios

Daily News, News

4.5705 Ratings

🗓️ 9 April 2020

⏱️ 9 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Hydroxychloroquine has evolved from a sleepy anti-malaria drug into a partisan litmus test over the future of COVID-19 treatment. Dan and Axios healthcare reporter Bob Herman dig into what we know about the drug, what we still don't, and why both matter. PLUS: New money for small businesses and a way to help New York medical workers

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Axis ProRata, where we take just 10 minutes to get you smarter on the collision

0:08.9

of tech, business, and politics. I'm Dan Pramack. On today's show, new money for small businesses

0:13.8

and a way to help New York medical workers. But first, breaking down hydroxychloroquine.

0:19.3

So by now you have probably heard of this drug, hydroxychloroquine,

0:22.4

which has been around for decades, but the only people who really knew about it were doctors

0:26.5

and patients suffering from malaria or certain autoimmune diseases, like lupus or rheumatoid arthritis.

0:32.1

It's not the sort of thing that they were Superobol ads about. But all of that changed a

0:35.5

couple weeks ago. After President Trump began hearing about

0:38.3

a very limited study in France that hydroxychloroquine could help treat people infected with COVID-19.

0:44.3

And then he and some of his associates have taken to suggesting it might be the answer that's been sitting right in front of our noses.

0:50.3

The trouble, of course, is that we just don't know yet if it works or not.

0:55.2

Yes, some people have used it and recovered. Other people didn't use it and recovered.

1:00.0

It's also possible that some people used it and still died. The science is just not yet known,

1:05.7

something that normal times would be widely accepted as the scientific process, but which today

1:10.4

has become a partisan

1:11.7

fault line. Why it matters, of course, is that a legitimate treatment would be the fastest way to

1:16.2

not only cure the sick, but also reopen our economy. But false promises can lead to false hopes

1:21.3

and divert our attention from other possible treatments. So to break it down, I am joined by Axios

1:25.6

healthcare reporter Bob Herman. Let's start here with the science of

1:29.3

this. We obviously have heard lots of anecdotes from the president, from cable talk show hosts and from

1:33.9

patients who have recovered or not. Can you help us here pull out the science from the anecdotes a bit

1:40.2

on the science? Where are we right now when it comes to hydroxychloroquine? I think it's just first worth noting that there are many other reporters who have covered

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in -1818 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Axios, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Axios and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.