This is Jim Simovan and you are listening to That UFO podcast.

Yeah.

Imagine Steve said, can Jeremy speak to the donor alignment of people like Nancy Mace who are attempting to steal disclosure?

Is it related to figures like Peter Thiel?

Can he speak to any figures or groups who the UFO topic following public

should be skeptical about related to this? I think we should be highly aware that they said in Congress

that certain questions were not to be asked.

I think we should be highly aware of when Representative Burchett

referenced financial interest in Congress.

And I think we should be highly aware of the financial influences

that are now tied to the UFO,

UAP disclosure movement.

I won't sit here and say that I fully understand it

or that I have conclusions yet, but I am tracking it.

And I think the question from your audience member is a very valuable question.

And the reason I think it is is because if you look at what the motivation would be financially

tied to the UFO phenomenon, you can just look back in history.

And you can see that certain craft and materials have been allocated to certain defense

contractors.

And those materials have been exploited for derivative technologies.

And one that is very popularly known is Lockheed Martin. And we know that because the head of the DIA UFO program, Dr. James Lakatsky, talked about a transfer from the vice president of Lockheed Martin that was supposed to go to OSAP, a DIA program, and it was shut down by the head of the CIA, two people within the CIA. So you have to

wonder what is the financial advantage to being able to obtain and hold and exploit these technologies

...