meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Judge Rules Kohberger Can't Be Called 'Psychopath' or 'Sociopath' At Trial

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

True Crime, News, News Commentary

3791 Ratings

🗓️ 21 April 2025

⏱️ 14 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this captivating episode of Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski, we're breaking down the latest developments in the Bryan Kohberger case, exploring critical pretrial decisions that will shape the murder trial ahead. From Amazon purchase histories and emotional 911 call recordings to testimony from surviving roommates and even peculiar details like bushy eyebrows, the court's recent evidentiary rulings are setting crucial boundaries. Former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Faddis joins us to dissect exactly how these decisions could influence the outcome and explains why the admissibility of each piece of evidence could be pivotal.
Diving deeper, Tony and Eric unpack why the defense is aggressively challenging specific terms and evidence. What's behind the courtroom battle over using words like "murder," "psychopath," and "sociopath"? Eric reveals the strategy behind excluding emotionally charged language and discusses the legal rationale for allowing the jury to hear the chilling 911 call from surviving roommates under the "excited utterance" hearsay exception. We also discuss the significance of touch DNA found on the knife sheath, a pivotal yet controversial piece of evidence the defense desperately seeks to minimize.

Finally, we explore Kohberger's shaky alibi—stargazing on a cloudy night—and what it means for his defense. Will Kohberger himself have to testify to establish this alibi, potentially opening a Pandora’s box of risk for the defense? Tony and Eric weigh the pros and cons of Kohberger taking the stand and discuss whether the defense's strategies so far have done enough to create reasonable doubt. Don't miss this detailed analysis of how pretrial rulings could determine the trajectory of one of the year's most closely watched death penalty cases.
Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Hidden Killers with Tony Brewski.

0:04.1

Back to court in the Brian Coburger case, a hearing just taking place just the other day.

0:12.2

Not with, you know, fireworks, but a pretrial rulings that quietly decide what the jury will actually get to hear when things finally go to trial.

0:22.9

We're talking about Amazon purchase histories, 911 call audio, surviving roommate testimony,

0:28.6

and whether bushy eyebrows are legally significant enough to tip a murder case.

0:34.4

And just to make things even trickier, we've got autism, alibis, and the death penalty,

0:40.1

all tangled up into this legal chess match. So with all of these evidentiary decisions still

0:46.0

hanging in the balance, we brought in someone who knows exactly how these courtroom rules

0:50.4

shape a case, former prosecutor and defense attorney Eric Fattis. Eric, when a judge is making all of these pretrial calls about the jury, what they can and what they

1:00.6

can't hear, especially in a death penalty case like this, how much does that shape the outcome

1:06.0

before trial even begins?

1:09.5

It really installs parameters for the case. You know, there's all this

1:13.9

information we've heard about the case, but only some of that is going to be legally admissible.

1:19.0

It presents, puts up some guardrails, kind of. So the judge can ensure that the case doesn't go

1:25.5

completely off the rails with, you know,

1:27.7

conspiracy theories or evidence that is not legally competent and admissible.

1:33.3

And so it really sort of shapes what the jury is going to hear and affects the strategy on

1:39.2

both sides based on what those pretrial rulings will be.

1:42.2

And there's a lot of a thing.

1:43.9

I mean, basically, Ann Taylor went through the laundry list

1:46.4

to trying to get everything excluded and saw what stuck.

1:48.8

I was kind of like, it's funny watching her.

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 26 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.