meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
We the People

Justice Stephen Breyer on Reading the Constitution

We the People

National Constitution Center

History, News Commentary, News

4.61K Ratings

🗓️ 29 March 2024

⏱️ 66 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On Thursday March 28 at the NCC, Jeffrey Rosen sat down with Justice Stephen Breyer to discuss his new book, Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism. Justice Breyer deconstructs the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court’s majority and makes the case for a better way to interpret the Constitution based on pragmatism. Resources Justice Stephen Breyer, Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism (2024) Questions or comments about the show? Email us at [email protected].  Continue today’s conversation on social media @ConstitutionCtr and #WeThePeoplePodcast. Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate, at bit.ly/constitutionweekly.  You can find transcripts for each episode on the podcast pages in our Media Library.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello friends. I'm Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution

0:07.3

Center and welcome to We The People, a weekly show of constitutional debate. The National

0:12.3

Constitution Center is a nonpartisan nonprofit. of constitutional debate. The National Constitution

0:12.9

centers a nonpartisan nonprofit chartered by Congress to

0:16.6

increase awareness and understanding of the Constitution

0:19.5

among the American people. This week at the NCC I sat down with Justice Stephen Breyer as part of the

0:25.7

launch of his new book reading the Constitution, Why I Chose Pragmatism, not Textualism.

0:31.8

In his book Justice Breyer deconstructs the textual's philosophy of the current

0:36.0

Supreme Court majority and makes a case for what he argues is a better way to interpret the Constitution

0:42.4

based on pragmatism and

0:43.8

purpositism. It was a meaningful conversation that I'm delighted to share with you.

0:48.3

Enjoy the show. Hello friends.

0:53.0

Please join me once more in welcoming Justice Breyer back to the National Constitution Center.

1:00.0

Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you.

1:04.0

It's good.

1:05.0

Thank you.

1:08.0

It is always an honor to welcome our honorary co-chair here to the NCC and it's

1:17.2

extraordinarily meaningful to convene this evening to discuss his new book reading the Constitution why I chose

1:25.2

pragmatism not textualism. Justice, it is clear from this powerful book which

1:31.5

better than any other sums up the central methodological

1:36.6

debate on the Supreme Court today between pragmatism of which you're the

1:40.8

leading spokesperson and textualism which is the leading spokesperson

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in -369 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from National Constitution Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of National Constitution Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.