From the moment I've gotten into this investigation, into the safety of pharmaceutical products,

specifically vaccines, you know, all we've ever wanted is a debate.

All we've ever wanted is those people that say that they've properly tested these vaccines,

especially those that have made millions of dollars off of them.

Why won't you just sit down at a table?

Let's just put it all out

in front of an audience and say, here's what we have, what do you have, here's what we're asking

for, can you hand it over? It never happens. Every single year, in fact, I reach out to guys like

Dr. Paul Offutt and Peter Hotez and say, would you come on to my show? I'd love to interview you.

I actually think that they would find the experience more pleasant than they imagine.

But, you know, every year it's thank you very much, but no, thank you.

So that's why it was so awesome this week that Dr. Paul Offutt appears to have made a tragic error.

He decided that it might be safe to do a debate if it was just with the food guy.

I mean, what does he know?

Well, sparks flew because this is what the food guy had to say.

Vaccines, I think, are really the safest, best tested things that we give to children,

and that's what is making America healthy again.

And I think to focus on vaccines as a target and claim that they're causing harms when

they're not is only a detriment to America's children.

What's causing distrust in public health authorities is conflict of

interest, like Dr. Offutt taking millions of dollars from pharmaceutical makers like Merck while

approving and recommending pharmaceuticals on ASIP committees. It's the fact that Dr. Offit's saying that

...