Email from Michael. He says, fellas, I know this has been the case forever, but it doesn't make it right.

He says, why is the over under bet for regulation time? Why isn't the over under bet for regulation time only?

He says, I had the under in Arkansas, Texas Tech, and I got boned by overtime. It was the right side the whole way. Make it right.

You can't. It's the house's advantage.

It's why there was a zero put onto a roulette wheel or a double zero or now a triple zero.

It's why the house took three to two blackjack and changed it to six to five or why it went from single deck to double deck to five deck to auto shufflers.

It's all about the house.

You got to get it through your head. They do not care

about you. It says people who hit the over and overtime don't deserve it. People who lose the

under due to overtime don't deserve it. It's time of change is made to the betting world. This man's

crusade, Mike, it's noble, but he's never going to get it off the ground. Yeah, but they'll offer it to you at a price. Oh, you want to bet the regulation only?

Minus 130. Say, in hockey, you can. And I've made money doing it. You just bet the 60-minute line.

If you don't think the game's going to go to OT. Hockey's a poverty sport that they can't get action on.

Not that you can't do it. I've done it. If you feel like, hey, I don't want to bet the heavy favorite in hockey tonight.

You can just bet the 60 minute line and you end up getting instead of a minus 250,

maybe it's a minus 200 or a minus 185.

And again, I think there's some value to it if you think it's going to be a pretty easy win. Jim Costa with regulation lines.

That's right, baby.

Get those, pass those along to Kenny, see if he wants to put those.

Good, gravy.