And then, the Hey, this is Trey.

Thank you for joining us for a Thursday edition of our podcast, the question and answer

addition, the week of Easter, 2024. You know, Mary Langston, you don't, I mean you're like half my age, so if you had told me when I was sitting

around in the 1980s that the word or the number

two thousand and twenty four would come out of my mouth. I would not have believed you.

That seemed like really far in the future, but here we here we are we made it that's one way looking at it yeah we made it

Everything on me hurts what's not broken hurts but yes we made we here I remember my grandmother used to say that we're still here I'm still here

well your grandmother may be younger than I am too so I so I don't know.

No, like everybody is.

But you're right, it's Holy Week and Easter is coming

and it's a special week for sure and we have great questions again this week so are you

ready to get started? I think so I hope so let's give it a shot. Okay fingers

cross here we go we'll start with Brandon in South Carolina who actually has two parts to his question. He writes about the Willis topic and he says, why would the judge only require Mr. Wade to be removed from the case and allow Willis the option to stay on?

Does he have concern about removing her that might potentially muddy the waters on other prior cases that she has brought to the

court or is it more nefarious than that?

Uh, Brandon from the great state of South Carolina. Those are three as I count them.

Are really good questions. I'm not sure the order I'll take them kind of stream

of consciousness like Dr. Freud talked about. The judge strongly

hinted that he doubted the veracity of both Finally Willis and Nathan Wade. He

used one of my favorite words,

Mendacity, which is a fancy way of saying lying.

People lie all the time, actually.

...