Dr. Craig, I had a question about the persons of the Trinity and the idea of possible worlds.

I was recently reading your Attributes of God

series to my daughter. In God is three persons, Papa answers the objection. But then what if

all the persons disagreed with each other? By responding, each is all knowing, all powerful,

and all good. So God the-powerful, and all good.

So God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit always agree and act together in everything.

I understand this statement to mean that God's omniscience, omnipotence, and omnibenevolence

cause all members of the Trinity to choose to bring about what is best. However, elsewhere in your

published work, you have posited that there may be no such thing as a best possible world.

In your lecture, must God choose the best? You say, there is no reason whatsoever to think

that there is exactly one best possible decree that God might issue.

There is very plausibly an indefinite range of decrees available to God, which are equally good and unsurpassable.

In other words, there could be many options tied for best. If this is the case, what would stop

the persons of the Trinity from disagreeing? Say there are three options tied for best. What is stopping

the father from choosing option A, the son from choosing option B, and the Spirit choosing option C, if all are equally good,

and if all the members of the Trinity, in their omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence,

could plausibly bring about any one of them. The only reason I could think why they

wouldn't disagree is if the Son and Holy Spirit voluntarily submit to the will of the Father, which seems to be in line with what Scripture teaches.

But even in this scenario, they theoretically could disagree.

I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.

Even if the Father, Son, and spirit never do disagree.

Is there any reason why they couldn't disagree?

...