So, guys, Derek, more place more at aides.com.

Today we are going to be talking about the controversial topic of transgender athletes competing

in women's sports.

So if you have a male transitioning to female and they compete in female sports, you know,

how fair is it when they're manually suppressing their testosterone levels?

Obviously, you know, the argument is that these are no longer know how fair is it when they're manually suppressing their testosterone levels obviously you

know the argument is that these uh are no longer men biologically they are you know

identifying as females and their hormone levels reflect that so they have you know no

performance enhancing advantage and therefore they are essentially the equivalent of a biological

female so we did the equivalent of a biological female.

So we did the video a few weeks ago at this point of trans athlete smokes everyone in women's races and then claims that science proves it's fair.

And this was about Veronica Ivy and basically just fucking shitting on people in cycling events because, um, you know,

she literally was exposed to piqued genatropins coming out of her goddamn ball sack while she was going through puberty.

You know, that's like the fucking structural integrity of her entire body is totally different

than, uh, you know, a biological female that did not have the opportunity

to go through puberty with fucking crank through the roof testosterone and DHD levels.

So obviously, and that's not even factoring in, there's giant amount of estrogen that is

going to inhibit them from getting as tall or as lung of limbs or a bunch of other

things that men are otherwise going to be able to do.

So anyways, this is a, you know, a fucking hot topic and it's very, very controversial, of course,

even though I think the answer is pretty clear as day as to if there is a performance

enhancing advantage or not.

...