The Vulnerabilities of our Voting Machines, and How to Secure Them

The New Yorker Radio Hour

WNYC Studios and The New Yorker

News, David, Books, Arts, Storytelling, Wnyc, New, Remnick, News Commentary, Yorker, Politics

4.2 • 5.5K Ratings

🗓️ 21 October 2022

⏱️ 17 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The security of voting has become a huge topic of concern. That’s especially true after 2020, when it became an article of faith for Trump supporters that the election was somehow stolen by President Joe Biden. Alex Halderman, a professor of computer science and engineering at University of Michigan, has been studying voting machines and software for more than a decade. “We made a number of discoveries, including that [voting machines] had vulnerabilities that basically anyone could exploit to inject malicious software and change votes,” he tells the staff writer Sue Halpern. Conspiracy theories aside, he says, we must address those vulnerabilities in computerized voting. But hand counting of ballots, advocated by some election skeptics, is not a plausible solution. “Perhaps as time goes on we’ll get Republicans and Democrats to agree that there are some real problems in election security that we would all benefit from addressing. ”

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	This is the New Yorker Radio Hour, a co-production of WNWC Studios and the New Yorker.
0:09.4	Welcome to the New Yorker Radio Hour, I'm David Remnick.
0:14.2	For years now, there's been a concern that computerized voting machines are somehow less
0:19.5	secure than the old paper ballots we used.
0:22.0	What would happen if someone with ulterior motives got access to the software that counts
0:27.5	the votes? What kind of mischief could they do?
0:30.5	In May 2021, it happened and it happened through the person who was in charge of securing
0:36.2	the votes, an election clerk in the state of Colorado.
0:41.0	In Mesa County, Colorado, the election clerk, a woman named Tina Peters, somehow got
0:47.4	into her head months after the election of Joe Biden, that the election had been stolen
0:55.3	and that thousands of dead people had voted in the election that she was in charge of
1:01.4	running.
1:02.4	Staff writer Sue Halperin has been reporting for us on election security, including the
1:08.7	Tina Peters case.
1:11.0	And so she allowed stop the steel activists to come into her office and copy the Dominion
1:17.5	voting system software that was running the tabulators that they used to count the votes
1:23.4	in Mesa County.
1:25.7	Then they posted that information on the internet, so essentially they released it into the
1:32.2	wild for anyone to take a look at and potentially try to figure out if there were any vulnerabilities.
1:41.6	If a hacker would like to get into these systems, they now basically have the key to the castle.
1:51.0	Dominion is one of the big voting machine companies.
1:53.6	You of course remember that they were the target of far out conspiracy theories involving
	...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in -891 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from WNYC Studios and The New Yorker, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.