Trump’s PRISON Chances Just EXPLODED with NEW INDICTMENT

George Conway Explains It All (To Sarah Longwell)

The Bulwark

News, Politics, Society & Culture

4.8 • 2.8K Ratings

🗓️ 29 August 2024

⏱️ 43 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this episode of "George Conway Explains It All to Sarah Longwell," Sarah and George talk about Jack Smith's superseding indictment, Jack Smith's appeal in the Florida documents case, and George's and Sarah's wonderful time at the Democratic National Convention.

Find your forever cookware @hexclad and get 10% off at https://hexclad.com/ASKGEORGE! #hexcladpartner #sponsored

Follow Sarah at @SarahLongwell25
Follow George at @gtconway3d

Love the show but hate the ads? Bulwark+ subscribers get an exclusive, ad-free version of the show: https://www.thebulwark.com/subscribe

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	There's a superseding indictment that was brought down by the new DC grand jury in the January 6th case this week.
0:05.6	What does that mean? Tell us.
0:07.0	The most biggest change in the indictment was to get rid of conversations that Trump hadn't with other members of the government.
0:16.0	And other than that, the indictment charges exactly the same crimes.
0:19.7	The case is now stronger because it's just, it's more focused.
0:24.1	There's more than enough here to send him in prison for several years.
0:28.3	Hello everyone and welcome to George Conway explains it all to Sarah I'm Sarah
0:36.8	Longwell publisher of the bulwark and because I'm not a lawyer I've asked my
0:40.3	good friend George Conway from the society for the rule of law to explain the legal news to me and guess what George we've got legal news this
0:46.7	Yeah finally absolutely are you excited a superseding indictment I don't really know what that means but there's a
0:53.2	superseding indictment that was brought down by the new DC grand jury in the
0:57.1	January 6th case this week what does that mean tell us a superseding indictment
1:01.5	is basically an amended indictment.
1:03.6	In a civil case, it would be an amended complaint.
1:05.7	It's essentially like version 2.0 of the original indictment.
1:10.5	And what the special counsel did there was to edit the indictment to comply with the Supreme Court's erroneous decision on immunity.
1:21.0	The Supreme Court held the most biggest change in the indictment was
1:25.9	to get rid of conversations that Trump hadn't with other members of the
1:32.2	government leaving apart the vice president who I'll get to in a minute.
1:36.0	Essentially what the court said was that Trump's consultation with members of his administration,
1:42.0	e.g. the Justice Department, were immune from, you know,
1:47.0	you couldn't use him as admins and you couldn't prosecute him for a crime for conspiring
	...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in -213 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Bulwark, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Bulwark and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.