Spice Lovers. Are you ready to fill the fire this winter? Heat up the coldest month for the year with new limited edition Extra Flaming Hot Walkers. Bringing the heat to Britain's most love Chris brand. Don't be a denier. Own the fire. Try new extra flaming hot walkers. and try the rest of our range with extra flaming hot

Doritos, Walker's Max, and What's It's Crunchy.

Donald Trump is calling out USAID.

He seems none too happy, claiming that billions of dollars have been stolen. Now, he goes on to say that it

appears Politico seems to have received $8 million, but let's just clarify. That's not from USAID,

though I do have questions. It is largely known. USAID was funding media around the world

in some, in some form another BBC media action,

a charity received 8% of its revenue from USAID.

But the big scandal here is that the U.S. government has been buying subscriptions to news

services that cost insane amounts of money.

And of course, people want to make the argument, but it's a legitimate service that this news entity provides.

It's intelligence gathering.

So let me just take a pause real quick and lay it out right away for all of the naysayers, the corporate press, the liberal media.

Why would our government, with its very own CIA, be spending millions of dollars per year or more on intelligence gathering tools

from the private sector? I mean, don't get me wrong. If a handful of people at the CIA were like, we want premium access to behind the scenes

in these newsrooms, I'd say, okay, I guess.

It's a little mockingbirdish, but if you're just a customer, maybe.

But when you have, for instance, what was it, Department of Energy?

I think 172 subscriptions for one year costing $400,000.

It's really simple, my friends. These companies may make tens of millions or hundreds of millions of dollars.

However, they do, fine, whatever. But it's actually simple in that a kickback's a kickback. And if the

government says, sure, we'll subscribe to your exorbitantly expensive government tier, what's

...