4.4 • 7.9K Ratings
🗓️ 21 February 2023
⏱️ 45 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hello, I'm John Falen Hill and this is the weeds. |
0:08.8 | So the other week I was at the Vox offices in DC and I ran into my colleague Ian Mill |
0:14.4 | Heiser. |
0:15.4 | He covers the Supreme Court and Democracy and he's also a lawyer. |
0:20.5 | As we were shooting the breeze catching up, we got to talking about the upcoming cases |
0:24.5 | the court would be hearing. |
0:25.9 | He says on voting rights, affirmative action, and then Ian told me about a case that's |
0:32.1 | just as consequential but isn't getting the same amount of attention. |
0:37.0 | Gonzalez v. Google. |
0:39.5 | The case is about the power of algorithms. |
0:42.6 | It's about whether companies like Google or Twitter can be held responsible for crimes |
0:46.6 | like terrorism. |
0:48.1 | If one of their algorithms shows you a terrorist recruitment video or a tweet from ISIS, |
0:54.1 | oral arguments for the case are today. |
0:56.1 | Tuesday, February 21st. |
0:59.2 | No matter what happens during arguments, Scotus will rule on it this summer and if they |
1:04.8 | rule against Google, it could change the way we use the internet forever. |
1:12.1 | So I asked Ian to sit down with me ahead of oral arguments so he could walk us through |
1:17.1 | everything we need to know about the case. |
1:21.1 | Hello, hi Ian. |
1:30.7 | How's it going? |
1:31.7 | Good. |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in -729 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Vox Media Podcast Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Vox Media Podcast Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.