There's a terrible paradox here. I mean, how do you wrap your head around the idea that Jews are the subject of 60 to 70 percent of the hate crimes?

They're 2 percent or less of the population. And yet at the same time they also have positions of power in almost every

industry that matters in this country even though there are so few and they're subject to

so much prejudice. So it doesn't fit and therefore all the prejudice has to be

discounted.

There's too much cognitive dissonance.

And Jews are just oppressors, and that's it.

It's like operations on social realities

with a meat cleaver, and anything that doesn't't fit you just lop it off and the Jews don't fit.

They just don't. Earlier this month an oversight board at Harvard University said it had become aware of allegations

regarding three articles by Harvard University President Claudine Gay earlier in her career in which she failed to provide proper citations of other people's

work or quotations.

According to Harvard, an independent review found, and I quote here, no violation of Harvard's standards

for research misconduct, close quote.

But it did report that it had found, quote, a few instances of inadequate citation, close quote.

Now, earlier this week a congressional committee announced an inquiry into how Harvard has handled allegations of plagiarism.

Around the same time, in fact the same day, Harvard said that a different review had found

even more instances of failure to cite the work of others

in President Claudine Gay's writings, including in her 1997 doctoral dissertation, which was written at Harvard University in the government department.

Now there are a number of issues here. There's the issue of the university's current policy on plagiarism, which appears to apply one standard for its students and its faculty,

and another standard for its president.

Then there is the debate about what should actually constitute plagiarism,

...