Hey everybody welcome to another edition of Cold Case Murder Mini. I'm your host

Ryan Kraus taking you in a tour of my twisted mind once again. So today I want to pose a question to Jim Clementi regarding his analysis of the Jean-Bade Ramsey case last fall in a nationally televised event.

I happen to agree with his assessment that Burke Ramsey is the perpetrator of this crime

and that his parents covered it up in the aftermath.

However, Jim established that he believed Burke's voice was not only present at the end of the 911 tape, but that his words were in the form of a question, which was, what did you find? Of course, you just heard the emphasis placed on the word did.

And that's essentially what we need to talk about here. You see, this evidence was

presented to us in a fashion that suggested it was proof Burke was awake at the time of the 911 call, and therefore his parents lied.

So we're led to assume they had reason to lie for Burke, and it's easy to understand why.

I'm totally on board with this, except for one thing.

If the conclusion is that Burke committed the

murder is to the one action we must take in proceeding with this assumption

is to analyze the nature of what Burke said on the call.

So if he actually asks his parents what did you find, as proposed, then it's a fact he knows two things for sure

at this point.

One, he's aware his parents have conducted a search.

This means he didn't awaken due to his mother's frantic 911 call.

And two, Burke doesn't know his sister is dead.

Then we have to look at the manner in which he uses did if you place a hard emphasis on did

What you're doing is asking the recipient of the information to exclude that which was not found because it isn't important.

And you would do this in a situation where you knew they couldn't find the prize needle in the haystack,

but you still wondered if they found any clues at all.

So what we learned from this is that whatever Burke's parents were searching for,

...