meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Plain English with Derek Thompson

How to Watch Election Night Without Falling for Conspiracy Theories or False Hope

Plain English with Derek Thompson

The Ringer

News Commentary, News

4.8 • 1.8K Ratings

🗓️ 4 November 2024

⏱️ 43 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today’s guest (our final preelection guest) is David Wasserman, political analyst with the Cook Political Report, who also helps out with the NBC decision desk. There are dozens, maybe hundreds, of people whose job on election night is to help Americans understand when we can safely call specific districts and states for Congress, Senate, or the presidency. However, I truly don’t think I know anybody whose calls I trust more than David's. And the even deeper compliment is that David is perhaps the most trusted election night consigliere among all the other people I trust. So, when I wanted to put together a show on how to watch election night like a pro, I’m grateful that the pro of pros said yes. With a week to go, this election has attracted several theories about which trends will determine the outcome. We’ve done shows on the rightward shift among men, especially young men; the politics of working class decline; the possibility that we’ll see non-white voters move into the Trump column while college-educated white voters move into the Harris column. But these are all theories. It’s going to take a while to know if they’re actually true. When polls close at 7 p.m., you’re going to see some people dive into exit polls and incomplete county-by-county returns, claiming that they can see trends and predict the outcome. But as Wasserman tells us, this is not wise. Exit polls aren’t special. They’re just another poll. And their non-specialness is important to note in an age when so many people are voting early and therefore aren’t counted among surveys of election-day voters. Meanwhile, different states have different rules for when they can start counting early and mailed ballots. These rules dramatically and sometimes confusingly shift our understanding of election night. Pennsylvania cannot start counting mail-in or early votes until Election Day morning. This often leads to slower reporting of mail-in results, while Election Day votes are usually counted and reported first. Last election Republicans were more likely to vote on Election Day while Democrats were more likely to vote by mail. If the same thing happens in 2024, what we should expect to see is a red mirage followed by a blue wave—as right-leaning ballots are counted first and left-leaning ballots are counted second. This is not a conspiracy. It’s just state law. In the state of Georgia, it’s the opposite. Georgia and other Sunbelt states can begin processing and counting mail-in and early votes before Election Day, which means what you might see a blue mirage followed by a red wave. One conspiracy theory that’s already starting to attract attention is that any state that looks like it’s voting for Trump that sees a blue wave is a sign of voter fraud. But there’s nothing fraudulent about the state laws that determine the orders in which votes are counted. For this reason, Wasserman says, it’s tantalizing but misleading to draw strong conclusions about the election from incomplete county results. If you want to understand where the election is going, if you want to watch the returns, like a good faith pro, the better solution is to wait for full county results in key bellwether counties like Nash County, North Carolina. Understanding what those key, predictive, canary-in-a-coalmine counties are is the focus of this show. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at [email protected]. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wasserman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Did you know that scientific studies have found most people lie once every 10 minutes?

0:08.9

In my new podcast, Truthless, I'm talking to people about the lies, they tell,

0:14.4

from faking illnesses in high-pressure moments to making up stories on national TV.

0:21.7

From Spotify and the Ringer Podcast Network, I'm Brian Phillips.

0:26.5

Listen to Truthless on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Well, we made it.

0:43.3

Sort of.

0:44.7

Tuesday is election day.

0:47.4

And if you're tired of this election or excited for this particular podcast to move on from politics to explore the sunnier and more

0:55.0

fecened terrains of tech, science, psychology, sociological mysteries, I want to assure you,

1:01.8

I feel the same way, times 10. I wish I had the capacity during the final weeks of election

1:06.6

season to think deeply about topics outside of politics. I do not. I do not. And to the extent that

1:13.9

this podcast is a manifestation of my inner monologue, there is just no way to make a non-political

1:20.9

show in October of a presidential election year. So I am sorry for that. But today's guest

1:26.1

is our final pre-election guest, David Wasserman,

1:30.9

political analyst with the Cook Political Report, who also helps out with the NBC Decision

1:36.0

Desic.

1:37.0

There are dozens, maybe hundreds of people whose jobs on election night is to help Americans

1:42.4

understand when we can safely call specific districts

1:45.1

and states for Congress or Senate or the presidency. But I don't think I know anybody whose calls

1:51.1

I trust more than David. And perhaps even a deeper compliment here is David is, I think,

1:56.9

the most trusted election night consigliary among all the other people that I trust.

2:02.4

So when I wanted to put together a show on how to watch election night, like a smart person,

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in -146 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Ringer, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Ringer and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.