meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Nutrition Facts with Dr. Greger

Intermittent Fasting Part 4

Nutrition Facts with Dr. Greger

[email protected]

Health & Fitness, Alternative Health, Nutrition

4.83.6K Ratings

🗓️ 9 April 2020

⏱️ 15 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today we conclude our series on intermittent fasting with a cautionary tale.
This episode features audio from Is Alternate-Day Intermittent Fasting Safe?, Does Intermittent Fasting Increase Human Life Expectancy?, and The 5:2 Diet and the Fasting-Mimicking Diet Put to the Test. Visit the video pages for all sources and doctor's notes related to this podcast.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Have you ever noticed that every month seems to bring a trendy new diet and yet

0:05.9

obesity rates continue to rise and with it a growing number of health problems.

0:10.8

That's why I wrote my new book How Not To Diet. Check it out at your local public

0:18.0

library. Welcome to the Nutrition Facts podcast. I'm your host, Dr. Michael Greger.

0:24.9

Today we conclude our series on fasting with a cautionary tale about intermittent fasting.

0:32.3

Are there any downsides to fasting every other day? For example, might going all day without eating

0:37.6

impaired your ability to think clearly? Surprisingly, the results are very to be

0:42.4

equivocal. Some studies show no measurable effects and the ones that do fail to agree on which

0:48.0

cognitive domains are affected. Might the fasting-feasting cycles cause eating disorder type

0:54.1

behavior like binging? So far, no harmful psychological effects have been found. In fact,

1:01.0

there may actually be some benefit. Though the studies that have put it to the test specifically

1:05.8

excluded those with the documented history of eating disorders for whom the effects may differ.

1:12.3

What about bone health? No change in bone mental density was noted after six months of alternate

1:18.2

day fasting, despite about 16 pounds of weight loss, which would typically result in a dip in bone

1:23.7

mass. There were no skeletal changes noted in the control group either, however, that lost a

1:30.1

similar amount of weight using continuous calorie restriction. The researchers suggest that this is

1:35.2

because both groups tend to be more physically active than the average obese individuals by one to

1:40.4

two thousand steps a day. Proponents of intermittent fasting suggest it can better protect lean body

1:46.8

mass, but most of the intermittent trials have employed less accurate methods of body composition

1:52.9

analysis, whereas the majority of continuous calorie restriction trials used vastly more accurate

1:58.3

technologies. So today, it's not clear if there's a difference in lean mass preservation.

2:04.8

Improvements in blood pressure, antriclycerides have been noted on intermittent fasting regimens,

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in -1814 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from [email protected], and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of [email protected] and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.