4.9 • 2.1K Ratings
🗓️ 3 March 2025
⏱️ 46 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Welcome back to Unbiased, your favorite source of unbiased news and legal analysis. |
0:07.0 | Welcome back to Unbiased Politics. Today is Monday, March 3rd. Let's talk about some news. |
0:12.3 | Per usual, on Mondays, we start with some news from Thursday, and then we kind of just work our way forward. |
0:18.0 | So let's talk about this court ruling, pausing mass firings within the government. |
0:22.2 | Obviously, we know the Trump administration has been issuing these mass layoffs within the |
0:26.0 | government. Following those initial layoffs, multiple lawsuits were brought by those that lost their |
0:31.1 | jobs as well as labor unions that either were or may be affected down the line. So in this particular case, a coalition of |
0:39.1 | labor unions and nonprofits filed suit against the administration arguing that the Office of |
0:44.7 | Personnel Management exceeded its legal authority when it went ahead and directed these various |
0:49.9 | agencies to fire thousands of probationary employees en masse. Specifically, they argue that this action |
0:56.0 | violated the Administrative Procedure Act and that only Congress holds the power to control |
1:00.9 | federal employment and related expenditures. Now, I said previously that multiple lawsuits have been |
1:06.5 | filed. And the reason that's important is because these rulings have been different in different jurisdictions. |
1:13.6 | And we'll talk about what that means. |
1:15.3 | But just to illustrate, a federal judge in D.C. said recently that the administration could |
1:21.2 | continue with mass firings because the plaintiffs lacked the legal right to bring the lawsuit. |
1:27.1 | But in this case, which is out of San |
1:28.6 | Francisco, the judge said the government had to temporarily stop the mass firings because they were |
1:33.8 | likely unlawful. So what happens now when we have these conflicting rulings? Well, the ruling out of |
1:39.5 | San Francisco applies to the parties that brought that lawsuits. And the ruling out of D.C. applies to the |
1:45.2 | parties that brought that lawsuit in D.C. The San Francisco ruling applies to federal employees |
1:50.7 | that belong to certain branches of the American Federation of Government Employees Union and to other |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in -25 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jordan Berman, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Jordan Berman and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.