Hi, I'm Rob. And I'm Rob. And this is Ask Rob and Rob.

Hey everyone, welcome to Ask Rob and Rob, the show where you get your amazing questions in,

and we do our very best to give you a decent answer in return. We've done this a fair few times now,

and we've also reminded you a fair few times of how you can get on the show. But just in case it's not landed yet, or you're new to us, let's give you a reminder.

Oh, yeah, very simple.

All you've got to do is go to property hub.net slash ask.

Then you have to leave us a voicemail or you have to fill in a little form to send us a written question for the Sunday times.

But it all starts by going to Property Hub.net slash ask. All right, let's have a listen to our first question from Matt.

Hi, Rob and Rob. Matt here from Studley. Greatly appreciate all the work you do, from books,

podcasts, to even the Property Hub University online. All the stuff that you've pulled together

is fantastic. I wanted to ask a quick question

around some of the content that's been on around the different types of investment assets

and the pros and cons of each one of the things that wasn't touched on was scalability.

So obviously property has a whole host of different benefits

as you touched on, everything from being able to use leverage being one of the major factors there.

However, why don't the super, super wealthy, use property to build their wealth to the same degree?

It certainly doesn't seem to leverage the same way

that stocks, bonds, more liquid assets tend to. So I just wanted your kind of opinion on that.

Is there a point at which the liquidity issues, the friction in the property market, become

issues for scalability and where it's probably better to then switch over to looking

at stocks and bonds. That might be a property portfolio of 50 plus, it might be 100 plus, at which

point do you think it becomes a bit too much. Even if using multiple letting agents, you go from

...