4.8 • 688 Ratings
🗓️ 4 April 2018
⏱️ 72 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Specter Vision Radio. |
0:03.3 | Welcome to Weird Studies, an art and philosophy podcast with hosts Phil Ford and J.F. Martell. |
0:21.9 | For more episodes and to support the podcast, go to Weird Studies.com. Hey, this is Phil. |
0:51.5 | Now, look at something lying close by to you right now. I don't know what that might be. Maybe it's a potted plant or a musical instrument. Or a table. Doesn't matter. Look at your chosen object and ask, what am I seeing? Well, it's a table, right? What do you want? It's got four legs and a flat top with like a ring from where that one guy left his beer without using a coaster. |
1:17.4 | Now, a scientist might say, ah, no, you're not seeing the real table. |
1:21.5 | The real table is the swirling dance of energetic particles are revealed to us by science. |
1:28.4 | You can't see it, but that is the table's true reality. |
1:32.7 | Reality is available only through special techniques of study, mathematics, electron |
1:37.0 | microscopes, and whatnot. |
1:39.9 | But what if the reality of the table lay precisely in that aspect of it that we never see, and will never see, no matter what experimental techniques we devise? |
1:49.0 | That would be what Graham Harmon calls the third table. |
1:53.0 | The third table is a mystery. It draws us in and pushes us away. |
1:58.0 | We can never look at it directly, yet we might catch a glimpse |
2:02.0 | of it, sometimes, out of the corner of our eye, in that state of Gnosis called art. |
2:09.1 | What are things in themselves? Can you see them? Do you really want to see them? What claim |
2:16.3 | does the thing in itself have on us? |
2:18.8 | What happens when we go from thinking of a thing as it to thinking of it as you? |
2:25.9 | We hope you enjoy our conversation. So we're discussing Graham Harmon's essay, The Third Table. |
2:53.4 | It's kind of almost like a pre-C or summary of his philosophy, which he calls object-oriented philosophy. |
3:02.5 | The name later transmuted or evolved to object-oriented ontology, which is very convenient for internet philosophers |
3:09.7 | because they can abbreviate it, oh, oh, oh, which is fun to type. |
3:13.6 | And this is a movement in contemporary metaphysics that is, it's kind of part of a larger |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in -2550 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Phil Ford and J. F. Martel, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Phil Ford and J. F. Martel and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.