So, guys, this is Derek for more plates, more dates.com.

Today we're going to be talking about SARMs, liquids, versus capsules.

So I've covered this many times in the comment section, but I've never actually made a video or an article directly covering it.

So I just thought it'd be, by now I've been asked enough times that it probably has justified a full video, so there's a lot of confusion regarding which is more effective,

and there are several ridiculous theories and false statements thrown around the community purporting that liquid SARMs are more effective than capsules or pills.

And most of the time, these statements are simply deriving from misinformed individuals.

And at the end of the day, this is what you need to know.

All SARMs start out as raw powder, no matter what.

So when these raw ingredients are shipped out from their origin, they are in raw powder form to begin with before being put into any kind of delivery

system for administration to a research subject.

So now once that raw powder arrives, the decision must be made regarding which delivery

system to use for administration to the research subjects.

So here's the deal.

When it comes to research chemicals, putting a raw powder into a capsule may imply it is

for human consumption.

Hence, from a legal perspective, it isn't as appealing for many companies to choose capsules.

And this is why companies who sell liquids liquids sell liquids, not because sublingual

administration of a SARM suspended in grain alcohol yields a higher level of bioavailability

or other, you know, like nonsensical theories. They're simply trying to be more careful

legally. So that or they may get, you know, pre-made solutions from their supplier who already

have their research chems mixed in liquid form. But typically, if legal concerns were non-existent,

then my guess is that every single company would be using capsules for the most part, except

...